Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(102)
-
▼
July
(23)
- Prediction of the daily mean [PM.sub.10] concentra...
- Measurement and analysis of the relationship betwe...
- Modelling the temperature-induced blow-off and blo...
- Improving estimation of indoor exposure to inhalab...
- Evolution of particle number distribution near roa...
- Approaching gas-particle partitioning equilibrium ...
- Measurement of PCDD/F congener distributions in MW...
- Measurement of regional distribution of atmospheri...
- Determining gaseous emission factors and driver's ...
- Aerosol particle number concentration measurements...
- Measurement of fine particles in diesel emissions ...
- Total diesel exhaust particulate length measuremen...
- Theoretical versus observed gas-particle partition...
- Semicontinuous [PM.sub.2.5] and [PM.sub.10] mass a...
- Evaluation and comparison of continuous fine parti...
- Source identifications of airborne fine particles ...
- Regional transport and urban contributions to fine...
- Particle size relationships at the Fresno Supersit...
- The mobile source effect on curbside 1,3-Butadiene...
- Winter measurements of children's personal exposur...
- A cost-effective weighing chamber for particulate ...
- Real-time measurement of outdoor tobacco smoke par...
- Potential for simultaneous measurement of PM10, PM...
-
▼
July
(23)
Potential for simultaneous measurement of PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 for air quality monitoring purposes using a single TEOM [An article from: Atmospheric Environment]
This digital document is a journal article from Atmospheric Environment, published by Elsevier in 2004. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.Description: A simple numerical experiment demonstrates the potential for a single Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (TEOM) to scan sequentially for 5min periods across separate PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 size-selective inlets, to yield data at hourly and daily averaging periods that is little different in accuracy and precision to data from separate measurement systems. This offers the possibility of determining at any site all three particle mass measures at considerably reduced capital cost using one TEOM rather than three TEOMs. Moreover, use of a single TEOM sensor for all three data series would have the significant advantage of eliminating the bias between different instruments inevitably caused by slight differences in calibration and response. Field trials of the idea appear warranted.
Published on: 2004-07-01 Format: HTML Binding: Digital
0 comments:
Post a Comment